Unmoderated, remote user testing tools such as Loop11, provide the ability to target a large number of participants (up to 1000 with Loop11). However, recruiting and incentivizing participants to take part in remote, unmoderated testing can be more challenging than traditional moderated, lab-based testing, particularly if one hasn’t done it before.
A recent article on UXmatters.com breaks down and assesses the pros and cons of each method for recruiting participants for remote and unmoderated testing. The full article can be viewed here.
Happy Testing!
Give feedback about this article
Were sorry to hear about that, give us a chance to improve.
Was this article useful?
YesNo
